AGM-Style Revision of Beliefs and Intentions from a Database Perspective (Preliminary Version)
نویسندگان
چکیده
We introduce a logic for temporal beliefs and intentions based on Shoham’s database perspective. We separate strong beliefs from weak beliefs. Strong beliefs are independent from intentions, while weak beliefs are obtained by adding intentions to strong beliefs and everything that follows from that. We formalize coherence conditions on strong beliefs and intentions. We provide AGMstyle postulates for the revision of strong beliefs and intentions. We show in a representation theorem that a revision operator satisfying our postulates can be represented by a pre-order on interpretations of the beliefs, together with a selection function for the intentions.
منابع مشابه
AGM-Style Revision of Beliefs and Intentions
We introduce a logic for temporal beliefs and intentions based on Shoham’s database perspective and we formalize his coherence conditions on beliefs and intentions. In order to do this we separate strong beliefs from weak beliefs. Strong beliefs are independent from intentions, while weak beliefs are obtained by adding intentions to strong beliefs and everything that follows from that. We provi...
متن کاملYet More Modal Logics of Preference Change and Belief Revision
We contrast Bonanno’s ‘Belief Revision in a Temporal Framework’ [15] with preference change and belief revision from the perspective of dynamic epistemic logic (DEL). For that, we extend the logic of communication and change of [11] with relational substitutions [8] for preference change, and show that this does not alter its properties. Next we move to a more constrained context where belief a...
متن کاملJoint Revision of Beliefs and Intention
We present a formal semantical model to capture action, belief and intention, based on the “database perspective” (Shoham 2009). We then provide postulates for belief and intention revision, and state a representation theorem relating our postulates to the formal model. Our belief postulates are in the spirit of the AGM theory; the intention postulates stand in rough correspondence with the bel...
متن کاملIntention Guided Belief Revision
This paper aims to investigate methodologies to utilize an agent’s intentions as a means to guide the revision of its beliefs. For this purpose, we develop a collection of belief revision operators that employ the effect of the revision on the agent’s intentions as the selection criteria. These operators are then assessed for rationality against the traditional AGM postulates. There is a large ...
متن کاملOn the Logic of iterated Belief Revision
We show in this paper that the AGM postulates are too weak to ensure the rational preservation of conditional beliefs during belief revision, thus permitting improper responses to sequences of obserwtions. We remedy this weakness by augmenting the AGM system with four additional postulates, which are sound relative to a qualitative version of probabilistic conditioning. Finally, we establish a ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1604.07183 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016